Short Review of “One Course, Two Visions”

A review of One Course, Two Visions that I just posted on Amazon:

I gave this book 3 stars to be fair, because the book does show evidence of remarkable scholarship on the part of the authors, Perry in particular, and I do feel this is all serving a perhaps unintended purpose in helping us all to get clearer about what the Course is actually teaching. Yet, I agree with the other critical comments here that not only do Perry et al not do Ken Wapnick’s views justice, but they are missing an even more essential point: The Course’s own warning (if I may) to seek first the experience, and let not theology delay you. Read in context, Ken W’s “bleak” picture of the Course not only is not really so bleak, but is also in line with the Course’s own pedagogical thrust of helping us to see the fix or “hell” that our identification with the ego has us in.

Another major point that the Course is making is that what we choose to see creates our perception. I feel this is really what is at work with those who are against Wapnick — they don’t like him or what he’s saying, for whatever reason, and then come up with justifications for why that is so. All I can say is read Ken’s stuff with an open mind and heart, and you will perhaps see what others have seen: A master at work. To my mind, Ken got it (and sure, he was human, too), and there was a reason why he was chosen to do the work he did. Read Ken’s “Absence from Felicity” and his response to the copyright issue, among other things, and then make your final decision.

I want to also add that my comments are also made from my own direct experience. The Course is largely metaphor and symbol — it’s poetry — and does work on different levels, it’s not generally meant to be taken literally, except in places. I wish the authors all the best, of course, yet feel this is misguided.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Short Review of “One Course, Two Visions”

  1. Right On Target!
    Dr W’s excerpts shown in One Course Two Visions should answer/clear up any confusion for anyone who can move beyond the literal vision; and/or as W refers to this, beyond the bottom rungs of the ladder…

    • Perhaps the missing word for understanding Wapnick is the word “GROK”!
      Re Heinlen’s Stranger In A Strange Land! (To understand INTUITIVELY!)
      See Wikipedia…GROK, Heinlen, Stranger In A Strange Land, etc.
      Gunny G
      ****************

  2. Just noticed how often Wapnick’s writings/ACIM mention Stranger In A Strange Land……….was he leaving additional clues for us here? Re Grok: (Understand Intuitivelt)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s